[spyne] Factory with deepcopy?
burak.arslan at arskom.com.tr
Wed Oct 1 19:50:08 UTC 2014
On 01/10/14 13:51, Roberto Maurizzi wrote:
> I ended up trying to deepcopy the class with something like this (that
> also adds an optional header used for authentication - in a poor adn
> non-generic way, right now - and allows you to specify a different
> service name for the "clones".
> Is this something acceptable or did I miss some subtle (...or
> obvious!) side effect that will result in errors or worse once I start
> to use it "for real"?
> A test implementation looks to be working correctly right now, but
> concurrent use isn't enough to expose possible "reentrancy" problems.
For what it's worth, I can't think of a reason why deepcopy wouldn't work.
More information about the people